Overview
On May 13, 2022, the 44th session of the Oversight Committee for the Fukushima Health Management Survey (FHMS) convened online and in Fukushima City, releasing a new set of results (data up to September 30, 2021) from the fourth and fifth rounds as well as the Age 25 Milestone Screening of the Thyroid Ultrasound Examination (TUE). The fifth-round data reported this time includes more details of the confirmatory examination results, and the first age & sex distribution graph was released for the Age 25 Milestone Screening.
The 44th session was the second session of the fifth term (August 2021-July 2023) of the Oversight Committee. (The first of two-year terms consisting of quarterly sessions commenced at the 11th session on June 5, 2013, after the departure of Shunich Yamashita amid controversy surrounding "secret meetings.") It was unprecedented not only in the length of time that elapsed (seven months) since the previous session, but also in an unusual turnover of committee members at merely the second session: four members resigned, including Hokuto Hoshi who served as Chair for the five consecutive terms as well as Toshiya Inaba who as a fifth-term member and Vice Chair would have been a strong candidate to as new Chair. Everyone but Inaba has been replaced by someone from respective organizations, and the member roster stands at 17 for now.
Hoshi's resignation was due to his political activity as a candidate in the summer 2022 election from the Fukushima electoral district for the House of Councillors (upper house) of the National Diet of Japan. His declaration for candidacy in mid-December 2021 meant the end of his reign as the Oversight Committee Chair, and it turns out he did resign as a committee member a month later. His resignation was a welcome news to some of the long-time audience faithfully following the Oversight Committee. (Hoshi would often diverge into lengthy monologues and even occasional emotional outbursts during these sessions, in addition to expressing displeasure and irritation by questions and comments at press conferences. None of these behaviors seemed appropriate as Chair.)
Hoshi has now been replaced by Noboru Takamura of Nagasaki University who is also serving his fifth term. Takamura is a known disciple of late Shigenobu Nagataki and infamous Shunichi Yamashita. It should not be forgotten that shortly after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident Fukushima Prefecture appointed Yamashita and Takamura to be radiation health risk management advisors. The pair went around Fukushima, downplaying potential health effects of radiation exposure in order to soothe people's fear. An excerpt below is from a Wall Street Journal article published on August 16, 2011. (The article can be read here.)
On March 25, 2011 Takamura told about 600 villagers that they could continue to live safely in Iitate if they took precautions like wearing face masks outdoors and washing hands frequently, according to the village newsletter. Mr. Takamura said recently that radiation readings in the village were below 100 millisieverts — considered the threshold for health risk.
Takamura is also known to have told Iitate Village residents that children could safely play outside up to 10 µSv/h of the ambient radiation. Besides his involvement with fieldwork in Kawauchi Village and Tomioka Town through respective Reconstruction Promotion Bases at Nagasaki University, Takamura is also curator of the Great Japan Earthquake and Nuclear Disaster Memorial Museum in Futaba Town, as described in this interview.
After Yamashita's well-publicized departure from Chair in March 2013 which coincided with the end of FY 2012, it seems that the Oversight Committee has come full circle with Takamura as Chair.
On a separate note, only 3 months worth of new data as of September 30, 2021 was reported despite the lengthy pause of 7 months since the last session. The Oversight Committee is supposed to meet quarterly according to the implementation guidelines, but only 3 sessions each were held in 2019 and 2020, gradually widening the gap between compilation dates and report dates of the data. Quarterly sessions returned in 2021, and the data reporting was finally catching up, but now it's behind about 6 months even though other non-thyroid surveys were reporting the end-of-FY data as of March 31, 2021.
At this time, an official English translation is still only available up to the 40th session of the Oversight Committee. The Radiation Medical Science Center of the Fukushima Health Management Survey (RMSC/FHMS) has rearranged its website, and the meeting materials are now available on this page. The final results of the third round, released at the 39th session in August 2020, is also available in English on pages 2-20 of this report.
- The fourth round: 1 new case diagnosed as suspicious or malignant, and 3 new surgical cases.
- The fifth round: 3 new cases diagnosed as suspicious or malignant, and 2 new surgical cases.
- Age 25 Milestone Screening: 4 new cases diagnosed as suspicious or malignant, and no new surgical cases.
- Total number of suspected/confirmed thyroid cancer has increased by 8 to 274: 116 in the first round (including a single case of benign tumor), 71 in the second round, 31 in the third round, 37 in the fourth round, 6 in the fifth round, and 13 in Age 25 Milestone Screening.
- Total number of surgically confirmed thyroid cancer cases has increased by 5 to 226 (101 in the first round, 55 in the second round, 29 in the third round, 32 in the fourth round, 3 in the fifth round, and 6 in Age 25 Milestone Screening,
For the still ongoing fourth round, originally scheduled from April 1, 2018 through March 31, 2020, only 31 more participated in the primary examination between July 1, 2021 and September 30, 2021, with an unchanged participation rate of 62.3%. (Note: This is still below what the prior rounds registered (81.7% for the first round, 71.0% for the second round, and 64.7% for the third round), although it is slowly approaching the third round.)
In the Age 25 Milestone Screening, each screening year targets a cohort turning 25 during each fiscal year, and the results are reported every 6 months. The most recent implementation schedule available in English is from September 2020, which was reported to the 41st session of the Oversight Committee and can be found here. (No one is supposed to undergo a "regular: TUE within 2 years of becoming eligible for the Age 25 Milestone Screening.) Although each fiscal-year screening is earmarked for those turning 25 during that fiscal year, participants can take part in the screening anytime up to the year before they become eligible for the Age 30 Milestone Screening.
Note: The FNAC results show a minimum tumor diameter of 6.2 mm, which is 3.2 mm smaller than last reported. This means that newly detected tumors are smaller and thus potential candidates for non-surgical active surveillance. No change in the number of surgical cases seems to support this scenario. (No evidence exists for active surveillance of noninvasive thyroid papillary microcarcinomas in pediatric population, but individuals in the Age 25 Milestone Screening are mostly in their late 20's at diagnosis.)
Below is the summary of the previous screening results for the suspected/confirmed thyroid cancer cases. This information, already mentioned above except for the second round, can be difficult to locate in print. In particular, a breakdown of the "A2" assessment is only verbally reported during the Oversight Committee sessions.
Definition"A1": no ultrasound findings."A2": ultrasound findings of nodules ≤ 5.0 mm and/or cysts ≤ 20.0 mm."B": ultrasound findings of nodules ≥ 5.1 mm and/or cysts ≥ 20.1 mm.
- Second round (71 cases): 33 cases with A1, 32 cases with A2 (7 nodules and 25 cysts), 5 cases with B, 1 case previously unexamined
- Third round (31 cases): 7 cases with A1, 14 cases with A2 (4 nodules and 10 cysts), 7 cases with B, 3 cases previously unexamined
- Fourth round (37 cases): 6 cases with A1, 19 cases with A2 (5 nodules, 13 cysts, and 1 nodule & cyst), 9 cases with B, 3 cases previously unexamined
- Fifth round (6 cases): 1 case with A1, 2 cases with A2 (1 cyst and 1 nodule & cyst), 2 cases with B, 1 case previously unexamined
- Age 25 Milestone Screening (13 cases): 2 cases with A2 (1 nodule and 1 cyst), 3 cases with B, 8 cases previously unexamined
No comments:
Post a Comment